Final Reflection

Featured

Introduction Into My Final Reflection and S.M.A.R.T. goal

Recently, I started training to become a science teacher at a secondary school. A large part of my learning process involved tracking and evaluating my personal development during my placement. From this experience an effective technique I picked up was to use the aid of a S.M.A.RT goal, which would allow you to successfully reach your aims when starting a project (Haughey, 2014).

I decided to apply this style of learning to my UOSM2008 module, creating a S.M.A.R.T. goal at the beginning of the semester that I hoped to of achieved by the end of the module.

As a result, this reflection blog will evaluate my time on the module and whether I successfully achieved my goal based on the following sections: my personal development, self-evaluation of my blogs, feedback from peer markers and my overall conclusion.

Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

My S.M.A.R.T. goal: I will improve my digital literacy skills, by blogging, exploring and commenting on other people’s blogs and utilising resources such as MOOC, by the end of the UOSM2008 module.

Personal Development

My Digital Self-Assessment Tests

One method I used to evaluate the progression of my digital skills and assess whether I reached my S.M.A.R.T. goal was by comparing two digital self-tests; one from the start of the module and one from the end, shown below:

Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To analyse these tests efficiently I made an additional info-graphic below to help visualise my overall improvements. From the info-graphic it is evident that my biggest improvements were participating on online communities and managing my online identities. I feel this is mainly due to my participation on MOOC and the creation of an online network, made up of other student on the UOSM2008 module, where many of my comments on other bloggers work led to interesting discussions on topics that we were researching and learning.

Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

Additional skills

However, although very useful, I feel the digital self-tests do not cover all aspects of my skill development during my time on the module. More significant digital development included a vast attainment of knowledge on topics such as: online dangers and safety, types of online identities/users and assessing online information as well as the improvement of my digital vocabulary with new technical terms.

Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart
technical vocabulary
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

Self-Evaluation of My Blogs

Another method I used to assess my development towards my S.M.A.R.T. goal was the critical evaluation of my Topic 1-3 (and this Final Reflection) blogs, where I decided to incorporate Gibbs cycle to aid my structure (Gibbs and Coffey, 2000). My choice of using Gibbs cycle is due to the reflective and systematic nature of the framework as it provides clarity when discussing each phase of a project (Oxford Brookes University, 2018). Below I have created info-graphics on each topic around the cycle :

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

From each of my info-graphics I can see I have learnt a lot about each topic I have researched as well as aspects which I could improve on in the future to enhance my learning. From these cycles I have also been able to determine my biggest achievements and shortcomings during my time on the module:

 

acheivements and weaknesses
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

Feedback From Peers Markers

In addition to writing my blog posts, responding to critical feedback was also a crucial part to help develop and improve my skills. Therefore, in this final blog post I decided to incorporate improvements that have been suggested to me by peer markers. I have included in an info-graphic below, in the form of a checklist, in aim to make my current and future blog posts more appealing and clearer to readers:

improvements made
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

Conclusion

To conclude, as one of my biggest shortcomings was not including videos or animations in my blogs, I decided to improve on this by creating a short video, using PowToon, to briefly display a summary of my digital development shown below:

 

Ultimately, from this final reflective post, it is evident that I have achieved my S.M.A.R.T. goal to a good extent shown through the improvement in my: digital self tests, other mentioned additional skills, my media, data and information literacies and lastly my knowledge gained through my weekly blogs (shown using Gibbs cycle). I particularly enjoyed the module as it entitled me to freely express and present my views creatively through my blogs, as well as engage in discussions on topics I initially hadn’t been aware of.

In addition, my time on the module allowed me to question my online identity and gain a better sense of how I want to present myself and be perceived by others online. In future, I aim to improve my digital skills further by creating more blog pages displaying some of my keen interests and also incorporate info-graphics and videos in more of my academic work.

Word Count: 905

References:

  • Haughey, D. (2014). A Brief History of SMART Goals, Projectsmart, Available at: https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/brief-history-of-smart-goals.php (Accessed 21st May 2018)
  • Gibbs, G. and Coffey, M. (2000). Training to teach in higher education: A research agenda. Teacher development4(1), pp.31-44
  • Oxford Brookes University, (2018). Reflective writing: About Gibb’s cycle, brookes.ac.uk, Available at: https://www.brookes.ac.uk/students/upgrade/study-skills/reflective-writing-gibbs/ (Accessed 21st May 2018)

Topic 3: Reflection

Featured

 

  look down My Discussions:  look down 

I discussed this matter further with Tewsdae, who mentioned that people used online identities in the past to detach themselves from real life. At first, I didn’t agree, but upon discussion she pointed out a blogger who posts a more “unfiltered” reality on motherhood. Though this is not complete escapism, it made me realise that people can still use a single identity to express views online which they may not necessarily share as freely offline.

In addition, Tewsdae questioned whether I felt sharing less flattering content online is inauthentic. While I explained in my comment I do not think this contributes to inauthenticity, it made me reflect on my blog and the advantages I had included about single identities; previously I said a single identity can appear more authentic. But if you can hide unflattering content, how does this make such an identity any more authentic than using multiple identities?

Although I have learnt that the question of authenticity is far more complex than it seems, I also think that the line which separates identities, such as single and multiple, is blurred based on the content you share and how you share it. However, when tackling issues that affect all types of identities, such as cyber bullying and identity theft, we should focus more at how to stop and prevent it so that all identities can be seen as equally beneficial to use. Iarina helped me develop this thought when she pointed out the tragic case of Amanda Todd and how many social media platforms now combat such issues; Facebook and Instagram (which are mainly used for a single identity) have a system so one can report spamming and misbehaviour, while Reddit (which can be used as part of multiple identities) uses moderators to counteract harassment and propaganda

new-piktochart_28767552-3-e1525094012585.png

Word count: 300

My comment on Tewsdae’s blog

My comment on Iarina’s blog

References:

Topic 3: Online Identities – Multiple, Single & Anonymous

Featured

Maintaining an online identity/identities has become increasingly popular in our everyday lives. Whether it’s for professional or personal purposes, the benefits of a digital profile allows us to be accessible to others more easily and conveniently than we can manage offline (Costa, C. & Torres, R. 2011).

But what type of online identities are there and which is the most beneficial?

Exploring MOOC, I came across three main identities and the advantages and disadvantages of using them:

new-piktochart_29761032 (5)
Reference: FutureLearn (2018)  Created using Piktochart by Yusra Huque-Dowlet

Although all 3 forms have multiple pros and cons, it is still debatable which one tips the scale on being the most beneficial. Sheryl Sandberg argues that authenticity  is heavily valued among our society, especially on social media sites such as Facebook (Krotoski, A. 2012).

“A single public identity that’s an aggregated version of their offline past, the online present and their combined future” – Sheryl Sandberg (Facebook’s chief operating officer)

Though others, such as Andrew Lewman (executive director of the Tor Project) and Christian Poole (creator of 4Chan), disagree that singularity aids authenticity but rather, restricts it. Their argument being that we are “multi faceted individuals” and the ability to control your online privacy, using multiple identities or remaining anonymous, gives users the freedom to creatively self express themselves  without the fear of judgement from others (Krotoski, A. 2012).

However, it is possible that authenticity can’t be based purely by the amount of identities you possess online- besides, how much of our online identities actually reflects us offline? Ramona Pringle explores this thought in the video below:

But, similar to choosing a pet or which car to buy, decisions can vary depending on the person. Therefore, two main macro areas must be taken into account when deciding which identity is the best one for you – presentation and reputation (Costa, C. & Torres, R. 2011).

new-piktochart-_29789414
Reference: Costa, C. & Torres, R. (2011) Created using Piktochart by Yusra Huque-Dowlet

 

my-new-report_29795461
Created using Piktochart by Yusra Huque-Dowlet

 

multiple
Uploaded by Laura Collinton Available at: http://6iee.com/394799.html
new-piktochart_29796944
Created using Piktochart by Yusra Huque-Dowlet

 

 

 

 

 

multi2
Uploaded by Diana Cook Available at: https://www.thehrdigest.com/pros-and-cons-of-having-multiple-jobs/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Word count: 294

References:

 

 

Topic 2: Reflection

Featured

Looking back at my last blog, I learned that our personal learning networks can be restricted due to digital differences. This week, I have been able to further develop my understanding of online learning as I researched and evaluated the reliability of online sources.

I came across various concepts such as ‘filter bubbles’ and ‘echo chambers’ and the damaging impact of ‘fake news’, which I illustrate and discuss in my Topic 2 blog. More importantly, I realised how such algorithm bias’ have impacted my own Internet use through social networking sites such as Facebook, and how my real life decisions have been influenced, which I briefly discussed with Chloe on my blog.  She pointed out research which found that users who come across content with differing opinions are less likely to engage on such sites, which I can subconsciously relate to.

Additionally, I have learnt that our skills which allow us to assess authenticity of online information largely stems from digital education, which I have discussed individually with multiple bloggers: Bivash, Karishma and Sam.

Bivash interestingly pointed out how ‘traditional education’ vs new digital education affects our relation with filter bubbles:

new-piktochart_28504356 (2)
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

More over, Karishma also presents light towards a new game which aims to help young people spot ‘fake news’ more efficiently, supporting mine and Bivash’s attitude towards the importance of digital education. However, I still believe, despite new forms of education, we must also incorporate other strategies such as supporting investigative journalism and reduce financial incentives for fake news, to ensure all Internet users are addressed (not just the new generation).

Through my evaluation I have realised fact-checking is a good starting point when addressing online information.

new-piktochart_28943970
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart

Ultimately, improving our media literacy skills and checking the reliability and authenticity of sources allows us to thrive in a ‘social media driven world’.

Word Count: 301 words

My comment on Bivash’s blog

My comment on Karishma’s blog

References:

Topic 2: Assessing Online Information

Featured

 

Social media is currently the fastest carrier of information, providing instant news much quicker to a wider audience, as opposed to more traditional news outlets and sources (John Hopkins Sheridan Library, 2017). Though, when we evaluate the differences between print sources and online information we are able to identify distinctions between the quality of sources and how to be wary when using online sources.

Print Sources Vs Online Information
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart. Reference: Elmer E. Rasmuson Library (2015)

 

It is obvious that there can be more ambiguity and bias when using online sources compared to print sources, however, we still continue to use the Internet for retrieving large amounts of information due to easy access, convenience and also the opportunity to share and express opinions on topics and issues with both like minded and not so like like minded web users.

But by using the Internet, are we really exploring a wider range of information and broadening our views?

Eli Pariser in this TED Talk below explains the dangers of online ‘filter bubbles’ and how we might actually be narrowing our worldview through personalised searches on the Web.

 

danger of the web
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart. Reference:University of Southampton (2017)

think

 

think 2

While it is not easy to assess the reliability of online sources, due to numerous difficulties, there are many factors we must take into consideration which help make evaluation of information a lot easier.

 

 

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Media Literacy is a 21st century approach to education. It provides a framework to access, analyze, evaluate and create messages in a variety of forms – from print to video to the Internet. Media literacy builds an understanding of the role of media in society as well as essential skills of inquiry and self-expression necessary for citizens of a democracy” (Thoman and Jolls, 2005).

It is important that we ask ourselves these questions when evaluating our Internet sources to allow a thorough critical analysis.

Evaluating sources
Created by Yusra Huque-Dowlet using Piktochart. References:University of Edinburgh (2017),Georgetown University (2017),John Hopkins Sheridan Library (2017)
what else?
Reference:Horizon (n.d.).

“Education is a counterbalance to filter bubbles.” – Bill Gates

conclusion

 

Word Count: 295

References:

Reflection: Topic 1

Featured

Initially, I wasn’t aware how the term ‘digital differences’ applied to me; I assumed it referred to technical differences between certain technologies i.e. laptops vs tablets.

After participating on MOOC, and researching the concept further, I gained a better understanding and opinion on the topic and appreciation for the technology I have. After reflecting on my previous blog, I realise on a larger scale I am more of a digital resident than others (in third world countries) and I should utilise tools such as MOOC more, as others aren’t as fortunate to. connect

It was interesting to explore which factors had a greater impact on the digital divide and how it differed among various societies. Discussing this with Karishma, I realised I agree with Van Deursen & Van Dijk’s research; factors, such as age, may have a more prominent effect on the divide among populations similar to the Netherlands.

Although, Nathaniel addressed an important concern around disability, introducing me to a GuardianPost which explained how some UK users with additional needs are at a disadvantage when using the Web. I referred to the National Government Inclusion Strategy, enforced in the UK, to address this issue and even tackle this divide globally – however, Nathaniel pointed out that due to a lack of funding in other countries it will be hard to apply this strategy elsewhere and close the gap as effectively. This made me realise all factors have a significant impact on users in different ways and the digital gap varies on mainly two scales:

FACTORS

Though, not all aspects of the divide are negative as Chloe highlights the importance of digital differences allowing us to reflect on our daily activities online and offline and even motivate us to use technology more. Personally, I agree to an extent as being aware of digital difference makes me appreciate the technology I have around me. However, I support groups like GSMA who aim to give more users a digital identity worldwide and diminish the divide.

My comment on Nathaniel’s blog

My comment on Chloe’s blog

(Word Count: 329)

References: 

  • GSMA, (2016). Regulatory and Policy Trends Impacting Digital Identity and the Role of Mobile, (Available at: http://www.gsma.com/ mobilefordevelopment/ programmes/digital-identity) [Accessed 3 Mar. 2018]
  • Rust, E. (2015). How the Internet Still Fails Disabled People, The Guardian, [Accessed 3 Mar. 2018]
  • Maude. F, (2014). Government Digital Inclusion Strategy [Accessed 3 Mar. 2018]
  • Future Learn, (2017). Future Learn. Digital differences – inequalities and online practices [Accessed 25 Feb. 2018]
  • Halford, S. and Savage, M. (2010) Reconceptualizing Digital Social Inequality, Information, Communication & Society, 13: 7, 937 — 955 [Accessed 25 Feb. 2018]
  • Zickuhr, K. and Smith, A. (2012). Digital Differences, Pew Internet, (Pew Research Center) [Accessed 25 Feb. 2018]
  • Van Deursen, A. and Van Dijk, J. (2013) The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usages, Sage Journals, 16:3 [Accessed 25 Feb. 2018]
  • Damarin, S. (2000) The ‘Digital Divide’ Versus Digital Differences: Principles for Equitable Use of Technology in Education, Education Technology, 40:4, 17-22 [Accessed 25 Feb. 2018]

 

 

Reflection : Intro Topic

Featured

Before starting the module, I considered myself as someone with fairly good digital skills, but did not appeal to being part of online communities.

Having completed the introductory topic and analysing myself in a digital self-test, I have come to realise that my digital skills are surprisingly poor for a member of the ‘Net Generation’. Although Prenksy’s ‘Digital Immigrant’ and ‘Digital Native’ argument initially sounded convincing, I later realised that age is not the only factor that should justify a person’s online literacy, and these terms cannot be generalised.

self refThough, discussing this with Sam, where he explains that with regards to Prenksy’s theory, there must be a “relationship between the age of a user and the likelihood of them being a digital resident or visitor” shows that age may still be relevant, just not the most important attribute when describing a digital resident.

Reading White’s work I agree with the more general terms ‘Digital Resident’ and ‘Digital Visitor’ as it allows multiple factors to be considered when assessing a person’s online skills. I also learnt from Sinead’s blog, that depending on the context i.e. using the Internet for personal or professional purposes, your position on the spectrum can vary.

Additionally, after reviewing the self-test I realised there are more factors that determine the level of a person’s digital literacy skills. Sam draws attention to another aspect we should take into consideration, being the “amount of time spent on the Internet and time between each access of the web” as well as Sinead’s input that being able to use complex software (such as Photoshop) aids towards a digital resident.

Overall, I learnt the importance of digital literacy, as it incorporates a range of “complex cognitive, motor, sociological, and emotional skills” (Eshet-Alkalai, Y, 2004). I hope by the end of this module I adopt more of these skills to allow me to work effectively in digital environments. self reff

 

My comment on Sam’s blog

My comment on Sinead’s blog

(Word Count: 312)

References:

  • Prenksy, M. (2001). ‘Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.’ On the Horizon, Vol. 9 No. 5 Pages 1-6 [Accessed 11 Feb. 2018].
  • White, D. and Cornu, A. (2018). ‘Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement.’ Firstmonday.org, Vol. 16 No.9 [Accessed 11 Feb. 2018].
  • The Economist (2010). ‘The Net Generation, unplugged.’ [Accessed 11 Feb. 2018]
  • Eshet-Alkalai,Y. (2004). ‘Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era.’ Jl. of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 13, pg 93-106 [Accessed 18 Feb. 2018]